DegraffParente487

Like lots of folks in america, I've work. I work, they pay me. I pay my taxes and the us government directs my taxes while they see fit. In order to get that pay, I am required to pass a urine test, which I've not a problem with. And the main reason I have no problem with a drug test is because I have nothing to cover up. What I really do have a problem with is the distribution of my taxes to folks who are doing drugs and never have to go a urine test.

Because I've to pass one to generate it for them, should not one have to pass a urine test to get a welfare check?

Please comprehend, I've no problem with helping people return on the feet. I do, on another hand, have a problem with helping someone sit on their butt. Might you imagine how much money the state would save yourself if people had to move a urine test to obtain a public assistance check?

A 1999 Michigan law called for a pilot program of random substance abuse assessment in at the very least three counties. Drug assessment began in the beginning of October in Alpena, Presque Isle, and Berrien counties and a given section of Western Wayne County, including a few of Detroit's west side neighborhoods.

All the new candidates for that place had to provide a urine sample to officers or stop trying their to any government support. Furthermore, any individuals already in the device had to submit to random testing.

A class action suit was filed by the Michigan chapter of the ACLU two days just before routine testing. The suit charges that this program violates the constitutional rights of welfare recipients. A Detroit organization and two Michigan parents (The Westside Mothers) were called in the suit. The corporation focuses on addressing hundreds of welfare recipients and their loved ones. Kary Moss, executive director of the ACLU in Michigan says, "The Fourth Amendment guarantees that number individual in this country could be put through a search by the government until there is reasonable suspicion that they've committed some crime, welfare recipients may be bad, but that's not a not yet, anyway."

I have talked to several people face-to-face and on boards about their thoughts and those that oppose this have the exact same posture, that it is unconstitutional. For me, it seems that I am maybe not driving random drug examination onto any random resident. The welfare recipient decides to get help from the federal government. Therefore just like submitting paperwork, you must submit a urine test. Another position people speak about is false positives. Then execute a hair follicle test, well if they maintain fake good.

If urine test are unconstitutional, then scrap the complete welfare system. Let your voice be heard on Political Majority.com. medicaid diagnosis codes